Implicit Tangents

There is a small twist in the microscopic view of an implicit graph.

[Graphics:../HTMLFiles/Lect3_8.gif]

[Graphics:../HTMLFiles/Lect3_9.gif]

Click here  to Zoomin  

[Graphics:../HTMLFiles/Lect3_11.gif]

The contour graph of the local linear approximation

 ∂f/∂x[x, y] · dx + ∂f/∂y[x, y] · dy = 0  with gradient ∇f[x, y] = ( ∂f       )                            --------[x, y]  ...             ∂f                            --------[x, y]                            ∂y

at a fixed (x, y) where the gradient is not zero appears the same as a highly magnified view of the nonlinear graph focused at the specific point  (x, y).

[Graphics:../HTMLFiles/Lect3_16.gif]

If ∇f[x, y] = Overscript[0, ⇀], the implicit graph of 0 dx + 0 dy = 0 is the whole (dx, dy)-plane.  The microscope is broken!

A non-smooth implicit set

The function  g[x, y] = x · y  is smooth for all  x  and  y, with ∇g[x, y] = ( y )                             xCell[].  The implicitly defined solution set  g[x,y] = 0  consists of the  x-axis (y=0)  and the  y-axis  (x=0).  The gradient  g[x,y]  is nonzero everywhere except at  (x,y) = (0,0).  The solution set is not a smooth curve at this point, but two crossing curves.

[Graphics:../HTMLFiles/Lect3_25.gif]


Created by Mathematica  (July 2, 2004)